Form
Up until January 1, 2006, Educational Testing Service (ETS) created the GMAT. In their place, ACT has begun publishing the exam. The test has not changed, however; the Graduate Management Admissions Council (GMAC) has, since the dawn of time, directed the GMAT's content.
In all of their stodgy wisdom, GMAC has divided the test into the following three segments (according to the order in which they appear to a test taker):
- The Essays - two 30-minute essays in which the tester analyzes an issue and an argument, respectively. This section does not count toward our score but schools see it and doing well is imperative if you expect admission to the most selective MBA programs.
- The Math - 37 multiple choice math questions in 75 minutes. These questions cover arithmetic, algibra, and geometry via 'straight math' questions (x+2 = 4, solve for x) and word problems (two trains are traveling toward each other at 5 miles per hour ...) This section also presents about 13 questions in a nasty, ruthless format known as data sufficiency.
- The Verbal - 41 multiple choice verbal questions in 75 minutes. Verbal questions come in three specific varieties: Sentence Correction, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning.
On the surface, the test looks fairly benign. Solve for x, πr^2 some circles, find a few subject-verb agreements, bang out a couple essays, and you're done, right?
Wrong.
Over the years ETS (now ACT) and the GMAC have honed the GMAT into a sneaky, dastardly den of brambles that will, without remorse, ensnare, crush, and destroy anyone who dares underestimate its trickery. Because the test is computer adaptive (meaning it gets harder or easier depending on whether you answer questions correctly) it literally raises to your skill level and buries you under an ever strengthening set of quandries.
From what I gather, the SAT's got nothing on this sucker.
Thus far, I have studied between two and three hours a day for three weeks and two days. I have reviewed Princeton Review's Cracking the GMAT, 2006 and am working on Kaplan's GMAT 800. Once I'm finished with both books, I'll take Princeton Review's practice exams, assess my readiness, address my weak spots, and continue to bolster my strengths. Once I've reached a solid level of performance on the practice tests, I'll take one of two available practice tests published by ETS/ACT. These are the real deal and ought to give me a very good idea of how well I'll do on Test Day.
Ultimately, I plan to study for at least two months. Why so much? Because I want to score 700. How good is 700? Well, students at Harvard (ranked #1), MIT (#4), and Duke (#11) scored an average of 707, 700, and 701, respectively. In other words, I want a score that will make me a competitive candidate for the best programs in the world. Put another way, scoring 700 would put me in the 92nd percentile, meaning that I would've scored better than 92 out of a 100 test takers. Only 8 out of 100 people score better than 700 on the GMAT.
Needless to say, I've created a lofty goal for myself. But with nearly a month of studying behind me, I'm still confident that I can beat this test.

